Skip to content 
Major Appellate Win for Oakland Client
The Law Offices of Nabiel C. Ahmed are thrilled to announce a significant victory for our client who was wrongfully convicted of possessing a stolen firearm. This groundbreaking appellate win not only clears the way for new legal opportunities but also exemplifies our commitment to ensuring justice within the Oakland, California community.
Background of the Case
In 2012, our client faced serious charges including carrying a concealed firearm within a vehicle and carrying a loaded firearm in public. These allegations arose after law enforcement observed our client placing a stolen and loaded gun under the driver’s seat of his vehicle. When he exited the vehicle and entered another car as a passenger, officers discovered a second gun, which was legally registered to him.
Initial Convictions
The situation became convoluted when our client was later seen placing a bag containing the legally registered gun in the back of the vehicle. An observing officer charged him again, leading to the prosecution’s efforts to admit both legally registered firearms as evidence in the court. They intended to claim that this linked our client to the stolen gun from the earlier incident, even though substantial evidence connecting him to the possession of the stolen firearm was lacking.
Grounds for Appeal
Following his conviction, our client sought the expertise of Attorney Nabiel Ahmed to navigate the appellate process. With extensive experience and a robust understanding of criminal law, Attorney Nabiel was well-equipped to tackle the complexities of this case.
Identifying Errors in the Original Trial
During the appeal process, Attorney Nabiel identified several key points that warranted reconsideration:
- The court should not have admitted the evidence of the previously registered guns;
- The jury failed to apply proper scrutiny to the officer’s testimony;
- The prosecutor improperly facilitated the validation of the officer’s credibility, influencing the jury’s decisions.
Appellate Court’s Decision
As a result of these arguments, the appellate court found that the lower court had abused its discretion by allowing evidence that should have been excluded. This decision was pivotal, as it indicated a potential reset in the legal proceedings, allowing the case to return to the Alameda Superior Court for re-sentencing.
What Happens Next?
With the appellate court’s ruling, our client now has an exceptional opportunity for a more favorable outcome. Attorney Nabiel is dedicated to ensuring that his rights are fully protected as the case moves forward.
The Role of the Law Offices of Nabiel C. Ahmed
At the Law Offices of Nabiel C. Ahmed, we pride ourselves on our ability to advocate fiercely for our clients, especially in complex criminal cases. Our Oakland, California location means we are intimately familiar with local laws and procedures, allowing us to provide informed and effective legal counsel.
Contact Us For Your Legal Needs
If you or someone you know is facing similar legal challenges or has questions regarding your rights, do not hesitate to reach out. We are here to provide the support and legal guidance needed during your challenging time. For assistance, contact our office at 510-576-5544.
Listen on Spotify
