Skip to content 
Solicitation of prostitution is a highly publicized issue in our society, frequently depicted in television shows, movies, and unfortunately, even real life. Law enforcement employs undercover sting operations as one of their most effective methods for apprehending individuals, commonly referred to as “Johns,” who are soliciting prostitutes. In these operations, an undercover officer typically engages in a transaction, leading the suspect to believe they are about to exchange money for sexual services. At that moment, additional officers swoop in and make the arrest.
Generally speaking, these undercover stings are an accepted procedure. However, the distinction between an effective sting operation and entrapment can be subtle. In certain circumstances, the tactics used by law enforcement may inadvertently provide the strongest defense for those facing solicitation charges.
Understanding Entrapment
Entrapment is defined as a situation where a law enforcement officer uses inappropriate or improper behavior to unduly influence an individual to commit a crime they would not have otherwise committed. It is crucial to understand that if the officer merely presents an opportunity and the individual does not resist, this scenario typically does not qualify for an entrapment defense.
Entrapment can be assessed using the following criteria:
- **Objective Standard:** Were the police actions coercive enough to compel a reasonable, law-abiding person to commit the same crime?
- **Subjective Standard:** What was the nature of the inducement? How did the defendant react? Was there an attempt to resist, and how aggressive were the police tactics?
Evaluating Your Defense Options
Utilizing an entrapment defense can be advantageous in situations where law enforcement has egregiously overstepped the bounds of acceptable practice. However, pursuing this line of defense comes with inherent risks, especially for individuals with prior engagement in prostitution or similar offenses.
A judge will apply the subjective standard when assessing cases. A defendant with a documented history of engaging in prostitution may be deemed more likely to solicit a prostitute irrespective of the undercover officer’s attempts. Consequently, even when law enforcement’s methods are questionable, the entrapment defense could be ineffective in these scenarios.
Furthermore, it’s imperative to recognize that law enforcement agencies meticulously document every interaction between a john and an undercover officer. This recorded evidence provides a clearer picture to the court, facilitating a judge’s decision when determining if entrapment was a factor in the arrest.
Next Steps for Your Case
Determining the viability of an entrapment defense following a solicitation charge requires a comprehensive analysis of the unique elements associated with your case. If you have been arrested for soliciting a prostitute in Oakland, California, reach out to the experienced sex crime attorneys at the Law Offices of Nabiel C. Ahmed. Contact us at 510-576-5544 or fill out a brief online form to schedule a consultation and explore your options for defense.
Listen on Spotify
